Discussion: Survival in Cancer Patients

[ad_1]

Discussion: Survival in Cancer Patients
Discussion: Survival in Cancer Patients

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT : Discussion: Survival in Cancer Patients

Question Description
Using each source attached write an 8 page research paper on the topic: How religiosity/spirituality affect the quality of life as well as survival in cancer patients.

Follow these directions:

A little over half of your paper (4-5 pages) should be devoted to the summary of the literature on your topic. You should include at least 11 peer-reviewed sources (these files are attached). Don’t just list the main findings of each study one by one, try to integrate the findings and critically review the research. For example, it might be that three studies found the same thing, so you could summarize the main ideas from all three together. When critically reviewing the research, describe what you think were some of the main ideas, limitations, or strengths from the research as a whole. This should represent your own ideas. In this section, I am looking for integration, synthesis, and critical analysis.

In the next section of your paper (2-3 pages), you will be translating the research you read to improving health in the real-world. How can you use the research to design an intervention for improving health in your community? You should notjust restate what another study did, but take it to the next level, describe how you would do it differently and why, make a case for why your plan for change represents is the best direction for impacting health out in the real-world. Be creative! For example, if you reviewed cell-phone based interventions to prevent smoking initiation among adolescents and found that the interventions were only somewhat helpful, this is your chance to describe a plan that you believe would work better based on the limitations of the studies you reviewed. Some things to consider: What were the biggest shortcomings of the research you reviewed and how would you improve on these shortcomings? How could you apply what you learned in your literature review to improve health in the real-world?

A suggested outline for the paper is as follows:

Introduction (1 page or less)Background and introduction to your topic. Some things to include:i.Disease or prevalence rates in your population; Who is affected?; How prevalent is it?
ii.Introduce your specific topic; Explain why your topic is important
*** Background articles used in the Intro should not be used in Section II, Lit Review
Literature review (4-5 pages)Summary, synthesis and critical analysis of the researchi.Include at least 11 references
ii.Integrate and synthesize the results of the 11 studies you have read
iii.Identify the strengths and weaknesses of the literature you read (in your own words!)
Translating research into practice: developing a plan to improve health (2-3 pages)Describe your plan to improve healthi.Drawing from the research you reviewed, design a plan to impact the health outcome you chose. What would it look like? Where/how would you implement it?
ii.Consider: What were the biggest shortcomings of the research you reviewed and how would you improve on these shortcomings in designing your own plan for change? How could you apply what you learned in your literature review to improve health in the real-world?

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

[ad_2]

Source link